Skip to content
logo

International Justice Resource Center

International Justice Resource Center

  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Facebook
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Twitter
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Instagram
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on LinkedIn
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on YouTube
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Vimeo
  • About IJRC
    • Who We Are
      • Board of Directors
      • Advisory Board
    • What We Do
      • Online Resource Hub
      • Litigation & Advocacy Support
      • Trainings
    • IJRC in the News
    • Work with IJRC
    • Contact Us
  • Human Rights Law
    • Human Rights Overview
    • Civil & Political Rights
    • Vulnerable Groups
    • Economic, Social & Cultural Rights
    • Country Factsheets
    • Research Aids
      • Books & Articles
      • Civil Society Actors
      • Human Rights Conditions
      • International Human Rights Instruments
      • Jurisprudence & Document Databases
    • Related Areas of Law
      • Asylum & the Rights of Refugees
      • International Criminal Law
      • International Humanitarian Law
      • Regional Integration Agreements
  • Courts & Monitoring Bodies
    • United Nations
      • Human Rights Council
      • Universal Periodic Review
      • Independent Experts
      • Human Rights Treaty Bodies
        • Human Rights Committee
        • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
        • Committee Against Torture
        • Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
        • Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
        • Committee on Enforced Disappearances
        • Committee on Migrant Workers
        • Committee on the Rights of the Child
        • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
        • Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture
    • Africa
      • African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
      • African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
      • COMESA Court of Justice
      • East African Court of Justice
      • ECOWAS Court of Justice
      • Southern African Development Community Tribunal
    • Americas
      • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
      • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
      • Caribbean Court of Justice
      • Central American Court of Justice
      • Court of Justice of the Andean Community
    • Asia
    • Europe
      • European Court of Human Rights
      • European Committee of Social Rights
      • Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights
    • Middle East and North Africa
    • National Bodies
      • National Courts
      • National Human Rights Institutions
      • Truth and Reconciliation Commissions
      • Universal Jurisdiction
    • Hearings & Sessions
    • Other International Bodies
      • International Court of Justice
      • International Criminal Court
      • ICTR
      • ICTY
      • Internationalized Criminal Tribunals
      • International Labour Organization
      • Courts and Tribunals of Regional Economic Communities
  • News & Events
    • News Room
    • IJRC Daily
    • Hearings & Sessions
    • IJRC Events
  • Media & Publications
    • IJRC Publications
    • IJRC Interview Series
    • Educational Videos
      • Advocacy before the Inter-American Human Rights System
      • El Litigio e Incidencia ante el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
      • Atuação perante o Sistema Interamericano de Direitos Humanos
      • Pledwaye Devan Sistèm Entè-Ameriken pou Pwoteksyon Dwa Moun
    • Training Sessions
  • Donate

European Human Rights Body Reviews Four Countries, Finds Discriminatory Practices

March 7, 2017 IJRC children, cultural rights, discrimination, economic, social & cultural rights, education, equal protection, European System, health, immigration & asylum, international human rights, migrants, regional human rights protection
The Council of Europe
Credit: Filip Maljković via Wikimedia Commons

In recently published country reports on Andorra, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Luxembourg, the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance (ECRI) found several areas in which migrants, Roma communities, LGBTI persons, and other minorities are susceptible to discrimination and unequal treatment. [COE Press Release: ECRI] In each report, the ECRI – an independent human rights body of the Council of Europe that monitors racism, xenophobia, antisemitism, intolerance, and discrimination – acknowledged positive developments and areas in need of improvement, including improving laws on hate speech, establishing specialized national bodies that work to eliminate xenophobia and racism, providing equal access to education and employment, and eliminating xenophobic and racist language or images in the political discourse. For instance, the ECRI found a disparity in access to education for migrants or ethnic minorities in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Luxembourg; found that hate speech was regularly used in the political discourse in Iceland and Bosnia and Herzegovina; and found that Andorra and Iceland both lack a national body with a mandate to combat discrimination and xenophobia. The reports, though, noted in some instances developments in criminalizing racism and discrimination; support for education and employment of minorities; and, in the case of Luxembourg, low levels of hate speech in the public discourse. The Commission published its findings in public reports and made recommendations to each country on legal and structural changes that could improve xenophobia, discrimination, and racism. [COE Press Release: Andorra; COE Press Release: Bosnia and Herzegovina; COE Press Release: Iceland; COE Press Release: Luxembourg]

Andorra

Since the previous ECRI Report on Andorra in March 2012, the ECRI found that while Andorra made several positive developments in combatting discrimination, the country still lacks effective implementation of laws and policies combating discrimination, racism, and xenophobia. The State improved its criminal law provisions to combat racism and discrimination; developed education programs to prevent and combat racist and homophobic prejudices and stereotypes in schools; and provided training to judges, prosecutors, lawyers, and civil servants. See ECRI, Report on Andorra (fifth monitoring cycle) (2017), at 9.

The ECRI noted, however, that areas of concern remain. In particular, the ECRI expressed concern over the lack of a specialized body with the capacity to combat racism and intolerance at a national level. See id. at 9. Further, it indicated that the collection of data regarding the application of criminal law provisions against racial offences is lacking, and, therefore, the law’s impact is unclear. See id. Additionally, the ECRI expressed that no progress has been made towards providing comprehensive, anti-discrimination legislation and integration policies that would ease residence requirements for obtaining Andorran citizenship or retaining dual nationality. See id.

The ECRI made nine recommendations to Andorra but prioritized two. See id. at 17-21. The first requires Andorra to create a national body specialized to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, antisemitism, and intolerance within the private and public spheres. See id. at 13. The second requires Andorra to introduce legislation that codifies the principle of sharing the burden of proof when discrimination complaints are brought before civil or administrative courts. See id. at 19. The ECRI will conduct an interim follow-up for these two recommendations within two years of the date of this report. See id. at 23.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Commission noted Bosnia and Herzegovina’s improved measures to combat racism and discrimination, such as trainings for State employees, but denounced the lack of political will to build an inclusive society. The ECRI noted, in particular, that the State started providing training to police officers, prosecutors, and judges to reduce levels of inter-ethnic discrimination and hate crimes; resolving discrimination issues in the area of pension entitlements; implementing measures to provide documentation for Roma community members and to support the enrollment of Roma children in schools; and implementing a strategy to advance the housing and infrastructure and employment rights of returnees. See ECRI, Report on Bosnia and Herzegovina (fifth monitoring cycle) (2017), at 9. Nevertheless, the ERCI denounced the State’s lack of implementation of the European Court of Human Rights judgment in Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, which would eliminate the ties between high political offices to a person’s ethnicity. The ECRI also expressed concerns over inter-ethnic tensions and hate speech against LGBTI persons; an ethnically segregated education system and no willingness to introduce integrated schools; an environment that openly rejects refugees; and high levels of exclusion within the Roma community. See id.

The report made several recommendations to Bosnia and Herzegovina. See id. at 12-32. However, it prioritized recommendations related to segregation in schools, specifically the need to end “two schools under one roof” and monoethnic schools, to develop a common curriculum, and to remove all symbols representing ethnic or religious bias in schools. See id. at 33. Additionally, the report prioritized strengthening institutional capacity of the Ombudsman Institution to effectively carry out its anti-discrimination mandate. See id. The ECRI will conduct an interim follow-up for these two recommendations within two years of the date of this report. See id.

Iceland

While the Commission noted Iceland’s efforts in combatting discrimination, the ECRI commented on areas in which the State could improve, including consistent implementation. The ECRI welcomed Iceland’s creation of a database to monitor online hate speech and development of an action plan to improve LGBTI persons’ situation in the education, healthcare, legal, and asylum contexts. See ECRI, Report on Iceland (fifth monitoring cycle) (2017), at 9. However, the report issued several recommendations related to the racist public discourse and hate speech that is not investigated or prosecuted under hate speech legislation; the lack of comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation aimed at combatting racism and racial discrimination; and the failed integration efforts for immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers. See id. at 11-26. The report prioritized the recommendations to enact a comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation and to undertake integration measures for immigrants, refugees, and asylum seekers, in particular measures related to housing, employment, and language access. See id. at 27. The ECRI will conduct an interim follow-up for these two recommendations within two years of the date of this report. See id.

Luxembourg

While the ECRI found Luxembourg has made many positive developments particularly in combatting hate speech, the Commission also noted several areas in which transgender persons and migrants still experience discrimination or are not fully protected by the law. The ECRI highlighted Luxembourg’s process of grouping together several institutions that combat racism and discrimination under one entity, the “House of Human Rights,” to increase cooperation among them. See ECRI, Report on Luxembourg (fifth monitoring cycle) (2017), at 9., 15. The Commission also highlighted the State’s efforts to extend criminal law protections against hate speech to transgender persons and to ensure LGBTI persons enjoy equal protections. Further, the report noted the prosecutor’s firm response to hate speech, the media’s coverage of relevant trials, a new campaign to raise awareness of hate speech, integration efforts welcoming refugees, and low rates of racist and homophobic or transphobic violence. See id. at 9.

Nevertheless, the ECRI found that Luxembourg’s constitution establishes a right to equality only for Luxembourgers and that the penal code does not make racist, homophobic, or transphobic motivation an aggravating offence. See id. at 9-10. It also found that sexual diversity is not addressed in schools and transgender persons still face difficulties in changing their name and gender in public records and official documents. See id. Additionally, the ECRI expressed concern over the use of the internet to spread hatred towards refugees, the lack of response from authorities to adopt integration policies for media and internet access providers, the high rates of unemployment and poverty for migrants, and migrant children’s underperformance in school. See id.

The ECRI’s recommendations addressed several of the issues found in the report but prioritized first, the adoption of a new national integration action plan, including an appropriate budget to ensure equality in education, employment, housing, and health standards for immigrants. See id. at 23-24. The ECRI also prioritized the adoption of a law that facilitates name changes and gender recognition for transgender persons. See id. at 31. The ECRI will conduct an interim follow-up for these two recommendations within two years of the date of this report. See id.

Background           

The ECRI’s mandate is to combat racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia, antisemitism, and intolerance in Europe, with a view to supporting the protection of human rights and the European Convention on Human Rights and its protocols. Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights prohibits discrimination “on any ground” when protecting and ensuring the rights and freedoms enumerated in the instrument.

The Commission’s three main areas of activity are country monitoring, work on general themes, and maintaining relationships with civil society and specialized bodies. The ECRI offers Member States expert insight on how to manage racism, discrimination, and intolerance in their country. It studies each country’s legal framework for fighting discrimination and intolerance, the existence of resources to assist victims, the experience of vulnerable groups within specific countries, and the public debate around relevant issues. The Commission also studies relevant international legal instruments and proposes action at the regional level. The ECRI’s findings are published in annual reports, which examine regional trends, and country reports.

The ECRI engages in country monitoring of racism and intolerance in each of the Council of Europe’s Member States. The most recent four reports were conducted as part of the ECRI’s country monitoring efforts. Country monitoring occurs in five-year cycles, with between nine and ten countries covered each year. The ECRI then formulates recommendations specific to each Member State.

The ECRI also issues general policy recommendations addressed to all Member States. They provide detailed advice to policymakers drafting national strategies and policies. General policy recommendation topics have included, among other things, combating intolerance and discrimination against Muslims, combating racism and racial discrimination in policing, combating hate speech, and safeguarding irregularly present migrants from discrimination.

Further the ECRI engages in awareness-raising about racism and intolerance among the general public, including organizing round tables and maintaining relations with civil society and specialized bodies.

The ECRI operates pursuant to Resolution Res(2002)8 on the statute of the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance and is comprised of independent experts appointed by each Member State of the Council of Europe.

Additional Information

For more information about the European Human Rights System, visit IJRC’s Online Resource Hub. To stay up-to-date on international human rights law news, visit IJRC’s News Room or subscribe to the IJRC Daily.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Post navigation

Previous Post:ILO Finds Asian Countries Inconsistently Protect Indigenous Peoples’ Rights
Next Post:News Clips- March 10, 2017

COVID-19 & Human Rights Oversight

See human rights bodies' COVID-19 guidance on our dedicated webpage, organized by mechanism and theme, and updated regularly.

For human rights bodies' schedule and activity changes due to the pandemic, see our Monthly Overview posts or the IJRC Hearings & Sessions Calendar.

Human Rights Document Search

Subscribe to the News Room


Search this Site

About IJRC

The International Justice Resource Center (IJRC) informs, trains, and advises advocates and individual victims on using international and regional human rights protections to advance justice and accountability in their communities.

Donate Today!

PayPal Giving Fund

Join Our Mailing List

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Save & Accept