Skip to content
logo

International Justice Resource Center

International Justice Resource Center

  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Facebook
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Twitter
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Instagram
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on LinkedIn
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on YouTube
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Vimeo
  • About IJRC
    • Who We Are
      • Board of Directors
      • Advisory Board
    • What We Do
      • Online Resource Hub
      • Litigation & Advocacy Support
      • Trainings
    • IJRC in the News
    • Work with IJRC
    • Contact Us
  • Human Rights Law
    • Human Rights Overview
    • Civil & Political Rights
    • Vulnerable Groups
    • Economic, Social & Cultural Rights
    • Country Factsheets
    • Research Aids
      • Books & Articles
      • Civil Society Actors
      • Human Rights Conditions
      • International Human Rights Instruments
      • Jurisprudence & Document Databases
    • Related Areas of Law
      • Asylum & the Rights of Refugees
      • International Criminal Law
      • International Humanitarian Law
      • Regional Integration Agreements
  • Courts & Monitoring Bodies
    • United Nations
      • Human Rights Council
      • Universal Periodic Review
      • Independent Experts
      • Human Rights Treaty Bodies
        • Human Rights Committee
        • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
        • Committee Against Torture
        • Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
        • Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
        • Committee on Enforced Disappearances
        • Committee on Migrant Workers
        • Committee on the Rights of the Child
        • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
        • Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture
    • Africa
      • African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
      • African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
      • COMESA Court of Justice
      • East African Court of Justice
      • ECOWAS Court of Justice
      • Southern African Development Community Tribunal
    • Americas
      • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
      • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
      • Caribbean Court of Justice
      • Central American Court of Justice
      • Court of Justice of the Andean Community
    • Asia
    • Europe
      • European Court of Human Rights
      • European Committee of Social Rights
      • Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights
    • Middle East and North Africa
    • National Bodies
      • National Courts
      • National Human Rights Institutions
      • Truth and Reconciliation Commissions
      • Universal Jurisdiction
    • Hearings & Sessions
    • Other International Bodies
      • International Court of Justice
      • International Criminal Court
      • ICTR
      • ICTY
      • Internationalized Criminal Tribunals
      • International Labour Organization
      • Courts and Tribunals of Regional Economic Communities
  • News & Events
    • News Room
    • IJRC Daily
    • Hearings & Sessions
    • IJRC Events
  • Media & Publications
    • IJRC Publications
    • IJRC Interview Series
    • Educational Videos
      • Advocacy before the Inter-American Human Rights System
      • El Litigio e Incidencia ante el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
      • Atuação perante o Sistema Interamericano de Direitos Humanos
      • Pledwaye Devan Sistèm Entè-Ameriken pou Pwoteksyon Dwa Moun
    • Training Sessions
  • Donate

Inter-American Court: State Inaction on HIV Violated Progressive Realization Obligation

November 6, 2018 IJRC discrimination, due process & judicial protection, economic, social & cultural rights, Inter-American System, international human rights, progressive development of law, regional human rights protection
Inter-American Court hearing in Cuscal Piraval et al.
Credit: CorteIDH via Flickr

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) for the first time held a State responsible for violating the progressive realization principle, determining that Guatemala’s inaction to extend healthcare services to people with HIV/AIDS contravened its duty to progressively achieve the full realization of the right to health, among other violations. [IACtHR Press Release] In Cuscul Piraval et al v. Guatemala, published on October 25th, the IACtHR concluded that Guatemala violated the rights to health, integrity, and life of dozens of people with HIV and their family members. [IACtHR Press Release] The Court found that while charitable and humanitarian organizations had provided some care for HIV-positive patients, Guatemala’s public health system had failed to ensure access to essential healthcare for those with HIV, in spite of national legislation and programs intended to address the known gap in services. See IACHR, Merits Report No. 2/16, Case 12.484, Luis Rolando Cuscul Piraval et al. (Guatemala), 13 April 2016. This case marks a major development in the economic, social, cultural, and environmental rights jurisprudence in the Inter-American System.

Facts of the Case & Procedural History

This case concerns 49 individuals who were diagnosed with the HIV virus between 1992 and 2003, and their family members. Of the victims in this case, 34 are currently living with HIV in Guatemala while 15 have passed away. See I/A Court H.R., Cuscul Piraval et al v. Guatemala. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of 23 August 2018. Series C No. 395, para. 34 (Spanish only). The victims in this case did not receive any public medical care from the time that they were diagnosed with HIV/AIDS (between the years of 1992 and 2004) until 2006 and 2007, when the State began providing minimal assistance to some people living with HIV. See id. at para. 34. Some of the victims had received temporary medical care from a nongovernmental organization, but both before and after their care was transferred to public clinics, the victims experienced gaps in care and barriers to accessing necessary medications, including because of the long distances to clinics and because of legislation that limited the availability of domestically-manufactured generic drugs. See id. at paras. 70, 119-27. The Court found that many of the victims also faced other conditions related to their socioeconomic status that exacerbated the impact of their medical condition. See id. at para. 63. For example, the Court found that some of the victims had limited financial resources, faced additional pressures as the primary providers for their families, were limited by low education levels, or were pregnant women. See id.

With regard to domestic remedies, the victims sent a letter regarding the situation to the Ministry of Health in 2002, which was later sent to former President Alfonso Portillo, and subsequently filed an amparo claim (legal claim for constitutional protection) with the Constitutional Court. See id. at paras. 56-57. However, they did not receive a response to the letter and their amparo claim was denied in view of President Portillo’s special budget allocation of funds, in 2002, for HIV treatment for 80 people (none of whom are named victims in this case). See id.

In 2003, the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) and other organizations submitted a petition on behalf of the victims to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), which the IACHR declared admissible in 2005. The IACHR referred the case to the Court on December 2, 2016, after Guatemala failed to comply with the recommendations contained in its April 2016 merits report, in which the IACHR found Guatemala responsible violating the victims’ rights to life, humane treatment, and judicial protection established in the American Convention on Human Rights (American Convention) and recommended measures to compensate and ensure treatment for the victims and to institute free treatment, monitoring, and training programs in public hospitals to ensure appropriate care for all people with HIV/AIDS. [IACHR Press Release]

The Inter-American Court’s Holding

The Court determined that the State did not comply with its positive duty to guarantee the rights to health, integrity, and life, protected under Articles 26 (progressive development), 5 (right to humane treatment), and 4 (right to life) of the American Convention. See Case of Cuscul Piraval et al v. Guatemala. Judgment of 23 August 2018, para. 72. It also found that the State violated the right of non-discrimination by failing to guarantee the victims medical care that accounted for their various vulnerabilities, particularly for the specialized medical attention that the two victims who were pregnant needed. See id. The Court noted that the lack of adequate medical assistance, which had a different type of impact on pregnant women and their unborn children who were at greater risk of vertical transmission of the virus, constituted gender-based discrimination. See id.

In the case of 13 of the victims who appealed to the Guatemalan Constitutional Court for judicial protection (the amparo claim), the Inter-American Court found that Guatemala had violated their rights to a fair trial under Article 8 and their right to judicial protection under Article 25 of the Convention. See id. at para.187. These violations resulted from the Guatemalan Constitutional Court’s failure to address the constitutional questions raised in the case, its failure to issue the judgment within a reasonable time, and its issuance of a decision without stating the reasons or justification for why it considered that President Portillo’s decision to allocate half a million quetzales for the medical care of people living with HIV was an adequate response to the victims’ situation. See id. at paras. 178-187. Additionally, the Court concluded that some of the victims’ relatives had suffered serious damage to their personal integrity, which violated Article 5.1 (the right to have physical, mental, and moral integrity respected) of the Convention. See id. at para. 197.

The Right to Health & Justiciability of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights

The IACtHR paid significant attention to the scope of its jurisdiction; the justiciability of economic, social, and cultural rights, and of the right to health, in particular; and the interaction between the American Convention and its Additional Protocol on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (“Protocol of San Salvador”). See id. at para. 75 et seq.

Article 10 of the Protocol of San Salvador expressly protects the right to health, but the Protocol only authorizes individual petitions to the IACHR with regard to alleged violations of Article 8(a) (trade union rights) and Article 13 (access to education), and only when the alleged violations are directly attributable to the State. Rather, States parties are required to submit periodic reports on their implementation of the Protocol of San Salvador, which are examined by the Organization of American States’ (OAS) Working Group on the Protocol of San Salvador. Guatemala has been a State party to the Protocol of San Salvador since 2000.

In contrast, the American Convention only refers, in its Article 26, to States parties’ obligation to “undertake to adopt measures…with a view to achieving progressively…the full realization of the rights implicit in the economic, social, educational, scientific, and cultural standards set forth in the Charter of the Organization of American States….” For its part, the OAS Charter inter alia commits States, in article 34(i), to dedicating their “utmost efforts” to the “[p]rotection of man’s potential through the extension and application of modern medical science.”

Based on its review of the relevant treaties, the interdependence and indivisibility of human rights, and its view that human rights treaties are “living instruments,” the IACtHR concluded in this case that economic, social, and cultural rights are justiciable and – as it determined for the first time earlier this year – that the right to health is a stand-alone right protected by the American Convention. See I/A Court H.R., Poblete Vilches et al. v. Chile. Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of March 8, 2018. Series C No. 349. (Only in Spanish); I/A Court H.R., Cuscul Piraval et al v. Guatemala. Preliminary Objection, Merits, Reparations and Costs. Judgment of 23 August 2018. Series C No. 395, paras. 97-102.

With regard to States’ obligations related to the right to health, the Court confirmed that some are owed immediately and others may be realized progressively. See id. at para. 98. Within the first category, States must immediately ensure access without discrimination to healthcare services. See id. In the second category, States must take concrete, continuous steps to increase the full enjoyment of the right to health. See id.

The Court reiterated that the right to health includes the right of every person to enjoy the highest level of physical, mental, and social health, including through timely and appropriate healthcare that is available, accessible, appropriate, and of good quality. See Cuscul Piraval et al. v. Guatemala. Judgment of 23 August 2018, at para. 107. It then determined that the right to health of persons living with HIV/AIDS includes access to quality goods, services, and information for the prevention and treatment of this disease, including antiretroviral medications, diagnostic tests, and other safe and effective treatments for HIV and related illnesses, as well as social and psychological support. See id. at para. 114.

With regard to the victims’ access to healthcare, the Court determined that prior to 2004, the State failed to provide them with any treatment and that, subsequently, the victims’ access to healthcare, medication, and social services was inconsistent, inadequate, and limited, in violation of their right to health. See id. at paras. 119, 126-27.

The Progressive Realization Principle

With regard to the progressive realization of the right to health, the Court emphasized that the progressive realization principle prohibits State inactivity, particularly in situations in which individuals face an imminent risk of serious harm to life or personal integrity. See id. at para. 146. The Court found that this is a risk that individuals living with HIV face when they do not receive adequate medical care, and concluded that Guatemala’s inaction with respect to providing medical care to this group of individuals violated the principle of progressive realization as envisioned by Article 26 and in relation to Article 1.1 of the American Convention. See id. Prior to 2004, the Court found the State had failed to provide healthcare to people with HIV/AIDS and instead relied on nongovernmental organizations. See id. at para. 147. However, because the IACHR had not raised the allegations of corruption, intellectual property barriers to generic drugs, and similar claims made by the victims’ representatives, the Court declined to determine whether those allegations also violated the progressive realization principle in relation to the right to health. See id. at para. 153.

A parallel principle is outlined in Article 2.1 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The IACtHR noted that it endorses the view of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which acknowledges that the progressive realization principle accounts for a State’s limited technical capacities or resources, but nonetheless imposes obligations that may require immediate action. See id. at paras. 80-81.

Recommendations of the Court

The IACtHR ordered Guatemala to take a number of actions to provide a remedy to the victims and their relatives, and prevent the repetition of these violations. [IACtHR Press Release] It directed Guatemala to guarantee free medical treatment, both physical and psychological, to the victims and their relatives; take steps to improve the healthcare benefits of people living with HIV; create a national HIV awareness and sensitization campaign; and provide compensation for material and moral damage to the victims and their relatives, including free education, and coverage of legal fees. See Cuscul Piraval et al v. Guatemala. Judgment of 23 August 2018, at paras. 198-251. It also ordered the State to implement mechanisms to regulate and supervise healthcare services; improve their accessibility, availability, and quality for people living with HIV; guarantee the provision of antiretroviral drugs and other appropriate medication for every person living with HIV, offer HIV tests to the public, and implement a training program for healthcare professionals. See id. at Puntos Resolutivos, para. 13.

Additional Information

For more information on the Inter-American System, visit IJRC’s Online Resource Hub, which also features guides on the right to life, and economic, social and cultural rights. For an overview of Guatemala’s human rights obligations, see IJRC’s two-page country factsheet. To stay up-to-date on international human rights news, visit IJRC’s News Room or subscribe to the IJRC Daily.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Post navigation

Previous Post:November 2018: United Nations and Regional Human Rights Bodies in Session
Next Post:UN Human Rights Committee Condemns “Burqa Ban,” Countering European Court

COVID-19 & Human Rights Oversight

See human rights bodies' COVID-19 guidance on our dedicated webpage, organized by mechanism and theme, and updated regularly.

For human rights bodies' schedule and activity changes due to the pandemic, see our Monthly Overview posts or the IJRC Hearings & Sessions Calendar.

Human Rights Document Search

Upcoming Hearings & Sessions

  • March 21, 2023
    • World Water DayWorld Water Day

      World Water Day is commemorated on March 22.
      all day
    • ECSR 333rd SessionECSR 333rd Session

      The European Committee of Social Rights will hold its 333rd Session from March 20 to 24. The agenda is not yet online. A synopsis will be posted following the session.
      all day
    • Human Rights Council 52ndHuman Rights Council 52nd

      The UN Human Rights Council is holding its 52nd regular session from February 27 to April 4, in person in Geneva, Switzerland.
      all day
    • Human Rights Committee 137Human Rights Committee 137

      The Human Rights Committee will hold its 137th Session from February 27 to March 24. While the Committee will meet in Geneva, it will undertake some activities in hybrid (in-person and virtual) mode. The Committee will consider the reports of Egypt, Panama, Peru, Sri Lanka, Turkmenistan, and Zambia concerning their implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
      all day
    • CRPD 28th SessionCRPD 28th Session

      The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities will hold its 28th Session, in person, from March 6 to 24. The CRPD will review Angola, Argentina, Georgia, Peru, Togo, and Tunisia concerning their implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its agenda also includes swearing in newly-elected members and selecting its bureau.
      all day
    • CED 24th SessionCED 24th Session

      The Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) will hold its 24th Session from March 20 to 31, in person, in Geneva. The CED will review Costa Rica and Zambia, and adopt lists of issues for its review of Benin, Malta, and Norway. Its programme of work also includes dialogues with Germany and Argentina concerning their reports on additional information.
      all day
  • March 22, 2023
    • ECSR 333rd SessionECSR 333rd Session

      The European Committee of Social Rights will hold its 333rd Session from March 20 to 24. The agenda is not yet online. A synopsis will be posted following the session.
      all day
    • Human Rights Council 52ndHuman Rights Council 52nd

      The UN Human Rights Council is holding its 52nd regular session from February 27 to April 4, in person in Geneva, Switzerland.
      all day
    • Human Rights Committee 137Human Rights Committee 137

      The Human Rights Committee will hold its 137th Session from February 27 to March 24. While the Committee will meet in Geneva, it will undertake some activities in hybrid (in-person and virtual) mode. The Committee will consider the reports of Egypt, Panama, Peru, Sri Lanka, Turkmenistan, and Zambia concerning their implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
      all day
    • CRPD 28th SessionCRPD 28th Session

      The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities will hold its 28th Session, in person, from March 6 to 24. The CRPD will review Angola, Argentina, Georgia, Peru, Togo, and Tunisia concerning their implementation of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Its agenda also includes swearing in newly-elected members and selecting its bureau.
      all day
    • CED 24th SessionCED 24th Session

      The Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) will hold its 24th Session from March 20 to 31, in person, in Geneva. The CED will review Costa Rica and Zambia, and adopt lists of issues for its review of Benin, Malta, and Norway. Its programme of work also includes dialogues with Germany and Argentina concerning their reports on additional information.
      all day

Subscribe to the News Room


Search this Site

About IJRC

The International Justice Resource Center (IJRC) informs, trains, and advises advocates and individual victims on using international and regional human rights protections to advance justice and accountability in their communities.

Donate Today!

PayPal Giving Fund

Join Our Mailing List

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Save & Accept