Skip to content
logo

International Justice Resource Center

International Justice Resource Center

  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Facebook
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Twitter
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Instagram
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on LinkedIn
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on YouTube
  • View ijrcenter’s profile on Vimeo
  • About IJRC
    • Who We Are
      • Board of Directors
      • Advisory Board
    • What We Do
      • Online Resource Hub
      • Litigation & Advocacy Support
      • Trainings
    • IJRC in the News
    • Work with IJRC
    • Contact Us
  • Human Rights Law
    • Human Rights Overview
    • Civil & Political Rights
    • Vulnerable Groups
    • Economic, Social & Cultural Rights
    • Country Factsheets
    • Research Aids
      • Books & Articles
      • Civil Society Actors
      • Human Rights Conditions
      • International Human Rights Instruments
      • Jurisprudence & Document Databases
    • Related Areas of Law
      • Asylum & the Rights of Refugees
      • International Criminal Law
      • International Humanitarian Law
      • Regional Integration Agreements
  • Courts & Monitoring Bodies
    • United Nations
      • Human Rights Council
      • Universal Periodic Review
      • Independent Experts
      • Human Rights Treaty Bodies
        • Human Rights Committee
        • Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
        • Committee Against Torture
        • Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
        • Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
        • Committee on Enforced Disappearances
        • Committee on Migrant Workers
        • Committee on the Rights of the Child
        • Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
        • Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture
    • Africa
      • African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights
      • African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights
      • COMESA Court of Justice
      • East African Court of Justice
      • ECOWAS Court of Justice
      • Southern African Development Community Tribunal
    • Americas
      • Inter-American Court of Human Rights
      • Inter-American Commission on Human Rights
      • Caribbean Court of Justice
      • Central American Court of Justice
      • Court of Justice of the Andean Community
    • Asia
    • Europe
      • European Court of Human Rights
      • European Committee of Social Rights
      • Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights
    • Middle East and North Africa
    • National Bodies
      • National Courts
      • National Human Rights Institutions
      • Truth and Reconciliation Commissions
      • Universal Jurisdiction
    • Hearings & Sessions
    • Other International Bodies
      • International Court of Justice
      • International Criminal Court
      • ICTR
      • ICTY
      • Internationalized Criminal Tribunals
      • International Labour Organization
      • Courts and Tribunals of Regional Economic Communities
  • News & Events
    • News Room
    • IJRC Daily
    • Hearings & Sessions
    • IJRC Events
  • Media & Publications
    • IJRC Publications
    • IJRC Interview Series
    • Educational Videos
      • Advocacy before the Inter-American Human Rights System
      • El Litigio e Incidencia ante el Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos
      • Atuação perante o Sistema Interamericano de Direitos Humanos
      • Pledwaye Devan Sistèm Entè-Ameriken pou Pwoteksyon Dwa Moun
    • Training Sessions
  • Donate

IACHR Holds Hearing on U.S. Executive Orders, U.S. Fails to Appear

March 23, 2017 IJRC assembly and association, civil society, economic, social & cultural rights, environmental rights, freedom of religion, IJRC Updates, immigration & asylum, Inter-American System, international human rights, liberty & security of person, migrants, regional human rights protection, thought, expression & association
Lisa Reinsberg of the International Justice Resource Center speaks before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.

On March 21st, the International Justice Resource Center (IJRC) was among the civil society organizations that appeared before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) in Washington, D.C. to address the “travel ban” and two other United States executive orders in a hearing held at the IACHR’s own initiative. In a remarkable departure from recent administrations’ engagement with the region’s human rights monitoring body, the U.S. failed to participate in the hearing.

Last month, in a joint letter submitted by IJRC and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), several dozen organizations urged the IACHR to examine alleged human rights violations resulting from U.S. President Trump’s executive order restricting the travel of individuals from seven Muslim-majority countries and the resettlement of refugees. The IACHR called for an expanded hearing to also include two other executive orders, one concerning the construction of a wall along the U.S. border with Mexico and for increased immigration detention and enforcement, and another that expedites environmental assessments of infrastructure projects such as oil pipelines.

The organizations presented specific requests that the IACHR could pursue to monitor the human rights situation, including conducting on-site visits to relevant areas, issuing press releases, and following up on the implementation of its prior recommendations to the United States, among others.

The webcast of the hearing is available on the Commission’s YouTube channel and on IJRC’s website, which also has additional information on the hearing, including civil society submissions to the IACHR.  

The State’s Failure to Participate

At the three hearings concerning the U.S. convened by the IACHR at its 161st session this week, the United States government failed to send a representative to participate. IACHR staff members informed IJRC that the government had telephoned on March 20th to inform the Commission that it would not be appearing on the 21st. Following the hearings, the U.S. State Department issued a statement indicating that it supports the IACHR but had determined it was inappropriate for the government to participate in these specific hearings because they raised issues currently being litigated in domestic courts. [Reuters]

While two of the hearings did involve questions that are the subject of ongoing litigation in the U.S., previous administrations have not invoked this reasoning and have participated in hearings on contentious issues such as the prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and racial discrimination in the criminal justice system. According to experts, it has been at least two decades since the U.S. failed to send a representative to participate in an IACHR session. [Huffington Post; Human Rights At Home Blog; Just Security]

Commissioners Macaulay, Eguiguren, and Vannuchi noted the government’s absence during the hearings and expressed their regret at this change in engagement. Commissioner Macaulay said it was “a pity” that the U.S. was not present to inform the Commission and respond to questions. In its press release summarizing the 161st session, the IACHR noted with regret the absence of the United States, Cuba, and Nicaragua at its hearings. [IACHR Press Release]

Importantly, however, the State Department spokesperson said that the failure to participate in this session “does not have any bearing on current or future U.S. engagement with the Commission.” Nonetheless, civil society members remain concerned in view of the Trump administration’s interest in curtailing participation in, and reducing funding for, intergovernmental and human rights bodies. [HRW; ABC]

Civil Society’s Requests and Participation in the Hearing

Representatives of the International Justice Resource Center (IJRC), American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinical Program, Hope Border Institute, International Indian Treaty Council, and the International Human Rights Clinic at the University of Washington  were collectively given 20 minutes to explain the impact of three executive orders on the human rights situation in the United States: “Border Security and Immigration Enforcements Improvements”; “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist entry into the United States”; and “Expediting Environmental Reviews and Approval for High Priority Infrastructure Projects.” The additional 20 minutes that would have been reserved for representatives of the United States government was instead absorbed into a lengthier question and answer dialogue between Commissioners of the IACHR and the civil society representatives.

Human Rights Implicated in the Executive Orders

For civil society organizations participating in the hearing, the predominant task was to provide information and evidence to the IACHR related to the impact of the executive orders on human rights in the United States. Organizations submitted written materials and spoke to the possibility of human rights violations in the context of the implementation of the executive orders.

The organizations divided their presentations between the three executive orders at issue. Regarding the travel ban, Abed Ayoub, representing the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, identified several possible human rights violations, including, enabling arbitrary detention, pursuing discriminatory practices, and failing to provide a safe haven for refugees.

Regarding immigration and border security enforcement, Jin Kim and Malene Alleyne, representing the Harvard Immigration and Refugee Clinic, reported increased border crossings from the United States into Canada, and identified possible human rights abuses, including, a lack of meaningful access to asylum protections; violations of the principle of non-refoulement through increased expedited removals; and violations of due process and personal liberty. Additionally, Jennifer Johnson, representing Southern Border Communities Coalition and Hope Border Institute, referenced broad civil and human rights implications resulting from the militarization of the U.S.-Mexico Border. Moru Mora Villalpando, speaking at the request of the International Human Rights Clinic at the University of Washington, underscored concerns emanating from the expansion of the for-profit model of detention centers implicated in the executive order, including, violations to humane treatment and the right to dignity. Further, Sarah Mehta, representing the ACLU, emphasized problems of the immigration enforcement expansion program, eluded to possible violations of the right of asylum seekers to seek asylum in the United States, discussed the right of entry, and addressed potential violations of personal liberty and due process for asylum seekers.

Finally, regarding the order on expedited environmental review for major infrastructure projects, Roberto Borrero representing the International Indian Treaty Council, identified alleged human rights violations, including, rights related to the free, prior, and informed consent of affected Indigenous persons in connection with development projects affecting their land and water; the preservation of sacred sites and religious practices; self-determination; and due process.

Request for IACHR Action

Lisa Reinsberg, of IJRC, presented a list of concrete recommendations to the IACHR. The recommendations, detailed in a joint written submission, include encouraging the U.S. to rescind the executive orders and their guidance; issuing timely press releases; carrying out on-site visits to the United States, to the Mexican and Canadian borders with the United States, and to Standing Rock Sioux Reservation; coordinating with relevant United Nations mechanisms; including the topic of U.S. immigration and refugee admissions in upcoming sessions; reviewing implementation of prior recommendations in cases pertaining to the rights of migrants in the United States, Indigenous persons and the environment in the United States, and in related thematic and country reports on the United States; monitoring environmental and cultural impact reviews and issues of consent for major infrastructure projects in the United States; and communicating with civil society organizations to request additional information related to human rights implications in this context, among others.

Additionally, the representatives suggested that shorter-term, more immediate, efforts such as those described above, would be preferred over the publication of a lengthy report on this topic.

The Inter-American Commission’s Response

After members of civil society had presented their positions, representatives of the IACHR asked questions and made brief comments. Commissioner Macaulay acknowledged her concern for the human rights situation of migrants in the United States. She emphasized the important role of civil society to keep the IACHR informed and to put pressure on the IACHR to continue to respond to human rights situations in a timely manner. Specifically, Commissioner Macaulay voiced her desire to make on-site visits to detention centers and other relevant locations within the United States. The Special Rapporteur for the Freedom of Expression, Edison Lanza, expressed his willingness to work with the members of civil society to protect the rights of those engaging in social protests in the United States and to receive more information related to reprisals against human rights defenders in the country.

Commissioner Paulo Vannuchi and Assistant Executive Secretary Elizabeth Abi-Mershed posed questions to the representatives at the hearing, including what the United States legislature and judiciary could do to protect human rights in the country and why civil society finds the revised executive order related to the travel ban to be discriminatory, for example, through targeting or disparate impact analyses.

The IACHR concluded the hearing by reaffirming its need for civil society to submit additional information and updates pertaining to the executive orders and human rights in the United States.

IACHR Monitoring of Human Rights in the U.S.

The IACHR is an independent, regional human rights body that is tasked with monitoring and ensuring the implementation of human rights within the 35 countries, including the United States, of the Organization of American States. As a part of its functions, the IACHR may hold hearings on issues related to human rights in the Americas.

The IACHR has consistently engaged with the United States and civil society representatives to examine alleged human rights abuses in the country, including, for example, through past hearings held on the human rights of indigenous persons in the context of extractive industries in 2016, the human rights of asylum seekers in 2016, criminal justice and race in 2015, excessive force by the police against people of African descent in 2015, and the human rights of persons deprived of liberty in 2014.

Additional Information

A recording of the hearing is available on the IACHR’s YouTube channel.

For more information on the hearing and to view background documentation and civil society’s written submissions to the IACHR, visit IJRC’s website.

For more information on the mandate, history, and procedures of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, visit IJRC’s Online Resource Hub.

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Post navigation

Previous Post:Guterres Reveals Strategy to Address Sexual Exploitation by UN Peacekeepers
Next Post:News Clips- March 24, 2017

COVID-19 & Human Rights Oversight

See human rights bodies' COVID-19 guidance on our dedicated webpage, organized by mechanism and theme, and updated regularly.

For human rights bodies' schedule and activity changes due to the pandemic, see our Monthly Overview posts or the IJRC Hearings & Sessions Calendar.

Human Rights Document Search

Upcoming Hearings & Sessions

  • March 30, 2023
    • Human Rights Council 52ndHuman Rights Council 52nd

      The UN Human Rights Council is holding its 52nd regular session from February 27 to April 4, in person in Geneva, Switzerland.
      all day
    • CED 24th SessionCED 24th Session

      The Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) will hold its 24th Session from March 20 to 31, in person, in Geneva. The CED will review Costa Rica and Zambia, and adopt lists of issues for its review of Benin, Malta, and Norway. Its programme of work also includes dialogues with Germany and Argentina concerning their reports on additional information.
      all day
    • CMW 36th SessionCMW 36th Session

      The Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (CMW) will hold its 36th Session from March 27 to April 6. During the session, it will hold constructive dialogues with El Salvador, Morocco, Nigeria, and the Philippines concerning their implementation of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families. The CMW will adopt lists of issues prior to reporting for Niger and Seychelles. Its agenda also includes discussion of efforts to promote the Convention.
      all day
  • March 31, 2023
    • Human Rights Council 52ndHuman Rights Council 52nd

      The UN Human Rights Council is holding its 52nd regular session from February 27 to April 4, in person in Geneva, Switzerland.
      all day
    • CMW 36th SessionCMW 36th Session

      The Committee on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (CMW) will hold its 36th Session from March 27 to April 6. During the session, it will hold constructive dialogues with El Salvador, Morocco, Nigeria, and the Philippines concerning their implementation of the International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families. The CMW will adopt lists of issues prior to reporting for Niger and Seychelles. Its agenda also includes discussion of efforts to promote the Convention.
      all day

Subscribe to the News Room


Search this Site

About IJRC

The International Justice Resource Center (IJRC) informs, trains, and advises advocates and individual victims on using international and regional human rights protections to advance justice and accountability in their communities.

Donate Today!

PayPal Giving Fund

Join Our Mailing List

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Save & Accept